It looks like more supermarkets and grocery stores chains start using the nutritional content scoring systems for food products, aparently, following the lead of Whole Foods (WH has been using their own ANDI scores for awhile now):
"A growing number of grocers are signing up to have the foods they sell evaluated and ranked for nutritional content at a time when government officials are studying whether more regulations are needed on packaging.
Two of the largest companies, NuVal and Guiding Stars, license their scoring systems to more than 3,000 grocery stores nationwide, according to officials at the companies.
The scoring systems have some differences. Guiding Stars uses a system of three stars to signify which foods are healthiest. Three stars is the best ranking. NuVal uses a 100-point system: The higher the score, the better the nutritional content."
While I agree that a single-scale scoring approach has obivous advantage compared to looking at calories/ carbs/protein/fat content separately, I am somewhat cautios about how these scales are normalized and validated. If the scale is normalized using a regular 2,000-calories daily requirements, and I am a fan of a low-fat low-carb high-protein diet (that is, my protein intake is higher and fat/carbs intake is lower than recommended by 2,000-calories diet), then this metric won't work well for me. The same would be true for follower of other kinds of specialized diets (e.g., Atkins).